Why Apple Won't Buy Twitter
NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Everyone freaked out over the weekend, when talk popped up of Apple
Tons of people linked to their own websites saying "Why Apple Must Buy Twitter," (heck, I even did it last year when the talks were reportedly ongoing) but there's one thing they fail to realize. Tim Cook, the guy who runs Apple, doesn't want to. It's not in their DNA.
Apple has always said if they cannot do something perfectly, they don't do it. They are in a few categories (phones, computers, tablets, mp3 players) and that's it. The majority of Apple's revenue comes from the iPhone, and buying a burgeoning social media network isn't going to help sell more iPhones.
Speaking at a AllThingsD conference earlier this year, Cook said, "Apple doesn't have to own a social network, but does Apple have to be social? Yes." Apple tried to own a social network (remember Ping?), and that did not go well, to say the least.
If Google had bought Twitter, this could've forced Apple's hand in changing its thinking. But it didn't.
Apple has no problem integrating social networks into its hardware, having done so with Twitter in 2011, and Facebook this year, but it doesn't need to own one.
Apple generates billions and billions of dollars in revenue from selling hardware, but few know about its ad business, iAd. That division of Apple has not done so well, and with good reason. Mobile monetization has not been figured out by anyone. Twitter is reportedly going to generate around $259.9 million in revenue this year (according to eMarketer), which is a drop in the ocean compared to Apple's overall revenue.
Everyone who says "Apple needs social" should look at the declining revenue growth in Facebook as the prime reason why Apple is better off partnering with these companies, and not investing or owning them.
There's no point in buying the cow, when you can get the milk for free.
Interested in more on Apple? See TheStreet Ratings' report card for this stock.
-- Written by Chris Ciaccia in New York
>Contact by Email.